![nytimes roxane gay trump racist nytimes roxane gay trump racist](https://www.chicagotribune.com/resizer/Ft3agC4omW4WKKcVMpXqSJ2comU=/1200x0/top/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-tronc.s3.amazonaws.com/public/DPBPDFWL3RDD7C2E4ZWYX7DJ3M.jpg)
Sulzberger said, “The Op-Ed page exists to offer views from across the spectrum, with a special focus on those that challenge the positions taken by our Editorial Board.” He added that the Times doesn’t “publish just any argument” and any op-ed needs to be “accurate, good faith explorations of the issues of the day.” In a memo to staff, obtained by CNN’s Oliver Darcy, publisher A.G. New York Times media writer Marc Tracy quoted Times opinion contributor Roxane Gay as saying Cotton’s op-ed “was inflammatory and endorsing military occupation as if the constitution doesn’t exist.” Slate’s Ashley Feinberg reported that a Times customer service center reported cancellations in the hundreds, while many staffers continued to fume. We believe that is one reason it requires public scrutiny and debate.” Nevertheless, Bennet tweeted, “Times Opinion owes it to our readers to show them counter-arguments, particularly those made by people in a position to set policy.” He also tweeted, “We understand that many readers find Senator Cotton’s argument painful, even dangerous. In fact, it’s still not clear who read it or signed off on it before it was published.
#Nytimes roxane gay trump racist series
In a series of tweets, Times editorial page editor James Bennet defended the decision to publish the piece even though the Times reported late Thursday that he told staff he hadn’t even read it before it was published. It also jeopardizes our journalists’ ability to work safely and effectively on the streets.” In a letter to leadership, an unspecified number of Times employees wrote, “We believe his message undermines the work we do, in the newsroom and in opinion, and violates our standards for ethical and accurate reporting for the public’s interest. The pushback was just as loud inside the Times as dozens of Times employees tweeted the same thing: “Running this puts Black staff in danger.” Readers accused the Times of publishing divisive and potentially harmful rhetoric that was suggesting something akin to martial law.
![nytimes roxane gay trump racist nytimes roxane gay trump racist](https://images-us.bookshop.org/ingram/9781328911247.jpg)
Cotton wrote, “delusional politicians in other cities refuse to do what’s necessary to uphold the rule of law.”ĭo what’s necessary? What does that mean?
![nytimes roxane gay trump racist nytimes roxane gay trump racist](https://www.out.com/sites/out.com/files/styles/image_style_360x203_1x/public/2019/08/07/ross-trump-gettyx750.jpg)
Cotton’s over-the-top editorial included such phrases as “feckless politicians,” “orgy of violence” and “bands of miscreants.”īut aside from being embarrassingly over-written, the op-ed appeared dangerous. Tom Cotton calling for the military to be deployed to cities during protests about the death of George Floyd, racial inequality and police brutality. Let’s start with The New York Times and an op-ed that has infuriated staffers and readers alike, and that could have lasting ramifications.Įarlier this week, the Times editorial board ran an op-ed piece from Arkansas Republican Sen. Two major metropolitan newspapers continued to deal with controversies of their own doing Thursday. To have it delivered to your inbox Monday-Friday, click here. The Poynter Report is our daily media newsletter.